<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Fastest response from MediaTemple.net &#8211; Awesome</title> <atom:link href="http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/</link> <description>A healthy and wealthy journey around the world one city at a time</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Terence Chang</title><link>http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-4899</link> <dc:creator>Terence Chang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:12:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/#comment-4899</guid> <description>@Baudouin:Sorry. I have no idea how to use urchin, I use Google Analytic solely.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Baudouin:</p><p>Sorry. I have no idea how to use urchin, I use Google Analytic solely.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Baudouin</title><link>http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-4892</link> <dc:creator>Baudouin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/#comment-4892</guid> <description>hello, are you on mediatemple Grid Service Cluster 2 by any chance ? And if you are, do you have access to the urchin statistics ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello, are you on mediatemple Grid Service Cluster 2 by any chance ? And if you are, do you have access to the urchin statistics ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Terence Chang</title><link>http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link> <dc:creator>Terence Chang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:03:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/#comment-16</guid> <description>HostingWiz:Yes. I don&#039;t have a lot of people reading my blog, I am not a famous writer. However, my blog is NOT hosted on MediaTemple.net. My blog is hosted on ANHosting.com.My client site hosted on MT are getting over 10 unqiue users from all over the US. I only see one down time this morning, which they have explained well and was not critical at this point. The site doesn&#039;t have a lot MySQL queries.I am not here to promote Mediatemple.net. I am their customer. I have very bad experience with other hosting companies. Every single hosting companies are different. Customer will never stop complaining about their providers. I understood that there is possibility to have server down, as long as it&#039;s reasonable and creditable. I can live with it. Or I will have to pay $1000/m to host at Rackspace.com with 101% up-time!After all, you may not get what your paid for. It&#039;s either more or less. Even Google have down time, but they spent million $$$ to prevent that. So the question is how much you will spend to get what you expect.;-)PS. Thank you for reading my blog.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HostingWiz:</p><p>Yes. I don&#8217;t have a lot of people reading my blog, I am not a famous writer. However, my blog is NOT hosted on MediaTemple.net. My blog is hosted on ANHosting.com.</p><p>My client site hosted on MT are getting over 10 unqiue users from all over the US. I only see one down time this morning, which they have explained well and was not critical at this point. The site doesn&#8217;t have a lot MySQL queries.</p><p>I am not here to promote Mediatemple.net. I am their customer. I have very bad experience with other hosting companies. Every single hosting companies are different. Customer will never stop complaining about their providers. I understood that there is possibility to have server down, as long as it&#8217;s reasonable and creditable. I can live with it. Or I will have to pay $1000/m to host at Rackspace.com with 101% up-time!</p><p>After all, you may not get what your paid for. It&#8217;s either more or less. Even Google have down time, but they spent million $$$ to prevent that. So the question is how much you will spend to get what you expect.<br /> <img src='http://www.terencechang.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>PS. Thank you for reading my blog.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HostingWiz</title><link>http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link> <dc:creator>HostingWiz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.terencechang.com/2007/05/22/fastest-response-from-mediatemplenet-awesome/#comment-14</guid> <description>LOL!!!! The only reason u aren&#039;t experiencing the ills of 99.9999% of mediatemple&#039;s customers is because nobody visits your blog. As soon as you begin to get more than 3 unique viewers in 2 days you&#039;ll understand.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!!!! The only reason u aren&#8217;t experiencing the ills of 99.9999% of mediatemple&#8217;s customers is because nobody visits your blog. As soon as you begin to get more than 3 unique viewers in 2 days you&#8217;ll understand.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/17 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 807/823 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.terencechang.com @ 2012-02-08 16:43:56 -->
